Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 39.2 to 19.1.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1064 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1061 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.