Model comparison
Command R+ vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 40.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1028 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1089 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 984 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1059 |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1023 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Command R+ leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 989 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.1 vs 28.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.