Model comparison
Command R+ vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 4 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 29.7% for Command R+ and 11.2% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | 22.1% |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | 13.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (29.1 vs 28.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.