Model comparison
Command R+ vs Nova Premier 1.0
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 23.0 to 9.2.
- Command R+ is cheaper at $2.50 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 38.3 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 44.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Nova Premier 1.0?
Command R+ is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.