Model comparison
Command R+ vs Mixtral 8x22B
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 7 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 15.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 41.9% for Command R+ and 50.2% for Mixtral 8x22B.
- Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Command R+ accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 64K.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-04-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 64K |
| Max output | 4K | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Command R+ leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | 50.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | 64.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 3.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R+: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
Reasoning Mixtral 8x22B leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1150 |
| DTBench | 54.9% | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 122.03 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1184 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 24.2% |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1113 |
| MMLU | 69.4% | 77.8% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 46% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 33.4% |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1116 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1166 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1141 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1037 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1057 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1158 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1151 |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1147 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 72.4% |
Long Context Command R+ leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1144 |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1141 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1130 |
| WildBench | — | 71.1% |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Mixtral 8x22B?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Mixtral 8x22B?
Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command R+ or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?
Command R+ scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command R+ does, with 128K tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Mixtral 8x22B share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.