Model comparison
Command R+ vs Llama 3.2 90B
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R+ leads 28.9 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 27.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R+: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 125.5 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 80.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R+: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | — |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 3.2 90B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.