Model comparison
Command R+ vs Gemini Advanced 0514
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Gemini Advanced 0514 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 24.6 to 9.2.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1255 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1248 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1272 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1215 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1274 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1307 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1275 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1242 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1242 |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1253 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1253 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1269 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Gemini Advanced 0514?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Gemini Advanced 0514 better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Gemini Advanced 0514 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17.