Model comparison
gpt-oss-20b vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 35.8.
- gpt-oss-20b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.018 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.09 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.1 (#185), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1389 |
| SciCode | 34.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 566.05 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
gpt-oss-20b: 9.2 (#146), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 3.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
gpt-oss-20b: 18.8 (#251), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1274 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 68% | — |
| LMCA | 14.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.81 | — |
Math gpt-oss-20b leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#93), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1317 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 65.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.5% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#186), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 74% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
gpt-oss-20b: 42.4 (#192), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1269 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1311 | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | 1239 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 1279 | 1384 |
| LMArena German | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1267 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
gpt-oss-20b: 62.0 (#235), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1236 | 1375 |
| IFEval | 73.2% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#203), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
gpt-oss-20b: 35.8 (#260), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1201 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 666 | — |
| WildBench | 73.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is gpt-oss-20b better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is gpt-oss-20b or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.