Model comparison

Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 12 shared benchmarks.

Command A

Cohere

35.9

Rank #212 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 44.3 to 26.8.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Command A and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Provider	Cohere	Xiaomi
Noometry Index	35.9	44.4
Released	2025-03-13	2026-09-22
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	256K	1.05M
Max output	8K	131K
Input $ / M tokens	$2.50	$0.14
Output $ / M tokens	$10	$0.28
Results tracked	24	13

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 26.8 (#317), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding	1331	1516
Aider Polyglot	12%	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.7 (#36), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	57.1%	—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 17.7 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts	1326	1481
Kagi LLM Benchmark	28.8%	—
DTBench	61.3%	—
LMCA	10.3%	—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 33.5 (#172), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math	1300	1477

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 36.5 (#157), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert	1295	1516
Vectara Hallucination Rate	9.3%	—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command A: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision	—	1266

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 45.5 (#166), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English	1313	1439
LMArena Chinese	1327	1501
LMArena Russian	1314	1424
LMArena French	1352	—
LMArena German	1341	—
LMArena Japanese	1283	—
LMArena Korean	1285	—
LMArena Spanish	1346	—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 69.3 (#172), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following	1309	1463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 40.6 (#147), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query	1334	1465

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Command A: 47.8 (#204), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Command A	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text	1331	1459
LMArena Creative Writing	1319	1408
LMArena Multi-Turn	1338	1460
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1145	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.