Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 44.0.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 44.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | 1516 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1481 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1477 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | 1516 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | 1424 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | 1463 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | 1465 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | 1460 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.