Model comparison
Command A vs Inkling
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Inkling in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.4 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 37.6% for Inkling.
- Inkling is cheaper at $1.87 / $4.68 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 66K.
Side by side
| Command A | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 44.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 66K |
| Max output | 8K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.87 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $4.68 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1464 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |
Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |
Reasoning Inkling leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1451 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 87.5% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 37.6% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.54 |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1479 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
Knowledge Inkling leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1465 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Inkling leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1490 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1458 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1448 |
Instruction Following Inkling leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1426 |
Long Context Inkling leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1434 |
Writing & Preference Inkling leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Command A | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1611 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Inkling?
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Inkling?
Inkling is cheaper. It lists at $1.87 per million input tokens and $4.68 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Inkling better for coding?
Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command A does, with 256K tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Inkling share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.