Model comparison

Command A vs Inkling

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Inkling in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.4 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 37.6% for Inkling.
  • Inkling is cheaper at $1.87 / $4.68 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 66K.

Side by side

Command A and Inkling specifications
Command AInkling
ProviderCohereThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index36.544.1
Released2025-03-132026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K66K
Max output8K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$1.87
Output $ / M tokens$10$4.68
Results tracked2441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Inkling: 34.5 (#234)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Coding13301464
FrontierCode—14%
Aider Polyglot12%—
LMArena WebDev—1413
FrontierSWE—4.1%
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—32.3%
ALE-Bench—946

Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Inkling: 29.6 (#85)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
APEX-Agents—33.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—
τ²-bench Banking—25%

Reasoning Inkling leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Inkling: 40.4 (#56)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Hard Prompts13261451
DTBench61.3%87.5%
LMCA10.3%37.6%
ARC-AGI-2—36.5%
SimpleBench—50%
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
ARC-AGI-1—79.5%
CritPt—5.4%
Chess Puzzles—21%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.54

Math Command A leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Inkling: 31.3 (#225)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Math13001479
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—0%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Inkling: 55.1 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Expert12951465
GPQA Diamond—88.3%
SimpleQA Verified—40.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Inkling leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Inkling: 54.0 (#52)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Non-English13131434
LMArena Chinese13271490
LMArena French13511458
LMArena German13411446
LMArena Japanese12851429
LMArena Korean12851404
LMArena Russian13141429
LMArena Spanish13471448

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Inkling: 75.1 (#71)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Instruction Following13091426

Long Context Inkling leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Inkling: 43.8 (#86)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Longer Query13341434

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Inkling: 65.2 (#51)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AInkling
LMArena Text13311441
LMArena Creative Writing13191387
EQ-Bench Creative Writing11451611
LMArena Multi-Turn13391436
EQ-Bench 4—1226

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Inkling?

Inkling is cheaper. It lists at $1.87 per million input tokens and $4.68 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Inkling better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Inkling share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper