Model comparison
Command A vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Command A and Gemma 3n E4b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 37.0 to 27.2.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1268 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1284 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1251 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1246 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1255 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1276 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Command A and Gemma 3n E4b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command A or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.