Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Grok Build 0.1
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 36.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 36.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Grok Build 0.1?
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok Build 0.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 36.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.