Model comparison

Command A vs MiniMax-M2

Command A and MiniMax-M2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2 leads 39.3 to 27.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 28.8% for Command A and 57.8% for MiniMax-M2.
  • MiniMax-M2 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

Command A and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Command AMiniMax-M2
ProviderCohereMiniMax
Noometry Index36.537.4
Released2025-03-132025-10-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K205K
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$10$1.20
Results tracked2421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding13301370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
Aider Polyglot12%—
LMArena WebDev—1297

Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads

Command A: 35.9 (#40), MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%57.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts13261357
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math13001352

Knowledge Too close to call

Command A: 37.1 (#159), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert12951337
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Command A: 45.3 (#170), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English13131313
LMArena Chinese13271366
LMArena French13511335
LMArena German13411355
LMArena Russian13141331
LMArena Spanish13471326
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following13091328

Long Context Too close to call

Command A: 40.6 (#151), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query13341331

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text13311340
LMArena Creative Writing13191286
LMArena Multi-Turn13391361
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than MiniMax-M2?

Command A and MiniMax-M2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Command A or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Command A does, with 256K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and MiniMax-M2 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper