Model comparison
Command A vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Command A leads 40.6 to 29.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 12% for Command A and 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.