Model comparison
Command A vs Command R
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 7 categories and Command R in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Command A leads 69.1 to 58.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.3% for Command A and 46.4% for Command R.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Command A | Command R | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2024-08-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 128K |
| Max output | 8K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Command R leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Command R: 29.3 (#306)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1169 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 17.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 45.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Command R: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Command A leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Command R: 13.8 (#331)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1164 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 46.4% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 9.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 21.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 33.3% |
| LiveBench | — | 27.5% |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Command R: 28.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1155 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 19.4% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Command R: 31.0 (#221)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1138 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 65.2% |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Command R: 35.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1174 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1182 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1162 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1176 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1143 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1163 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1174 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1151 |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Command R: 58.1 (#261)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1167 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 55.6% |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Command R: 36.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1198 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Command R: 38.2 (#254)
| Benchmark | Command A | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1187 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1170 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1163 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 16.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Command R?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Command R?
Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Command R better for coding?
Command R scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.3 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command A does, with 256K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Command R share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.