Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads 39.7 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 35.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 34.4 (#235)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1183 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 22.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1174 |
Math Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1195 |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.3 (#246)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1174 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1181 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1154 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.