Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 28.4.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Hunyuan T1 20250711 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderMetaTencent
Noometry Index30.241.8
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding10461389
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts10321399

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math10561414

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert—1395

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English10111395
LMArena Chinese9761424
LMArena Korean—1403
LMArena Russian—1384

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following10281375

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query10141384

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text10661401
LMArena Creative Writing10321391
LMArena Multi-Turn10151393

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper