Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
StepFunSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 43.7 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 39.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1316 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1304 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1287 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.