Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
GoogleSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 52.3 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 39.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 28.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 55.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1424 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 661.88 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 17.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 56.2% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 41.1% |
| BALROG | — | 33.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 548.84 |
Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1422 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 56.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 33.3% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 2.7% |
| DTBench | — | 76.5% |
| LMCA | — | 27.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.03 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.6 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1415 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 12.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 16.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1426 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1253 |
| GeoBench | — | 76% |
| VPCT | — | 46.2% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 36.9% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1433 |
| LMArena German | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1421 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1405 |
| IFEval | — | 89.8% |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 77.8% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1400 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.5% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| WildBench | — | 81.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1408 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemini 2.5 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemini 2.5 Flash better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemini 2.5 Flash share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54.