Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 36.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.