Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 33.6.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 29.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.