Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.1-70B

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.4

Rank #299 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1-70B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.1-70B leads 38.9 to 24.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 40.7% for Codellama 70b Instruct and 46.1% for Llama 3.1-70B.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.1-70B specifications
Codellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index33.329.4
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked735

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Llama 3.1-70B: 29.8 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%46.1%
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%54.8%
WeirdML—9%
LMArena Coding—1260
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 24.9 (#104)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
TheAgentCompany—6.9%
BALROG—27.9%

Reasoning Llama 3.1-70B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Llama 3.1-70B: 20.8 (#215)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10521241
DTBench—60%
LMCA—14.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.91

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 12.7 (#298)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.6%
Omni-MATH—21%
LMArena Math—1252
MATH Level 5—36.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 24.1 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
GPQA Diamond—44.2%
MMLU-Pro—65.3%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1209
MMLU—80.1%

Multilingual Llama 3.1-70B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.9 (#220)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Non-English9921219
LMArena Chinese—1215
LMArena French—1260
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1132
LMArena Korean—1140
LMArena Russian—1234
LMArena Spanish—1253

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-70B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.5 (#218)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Instruction Following10241231
IFEval—82.1%

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Longer Query—1241

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1-70B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.6 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Text10571261
LMArena Creative Writing—1232
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—784
WildBench—75.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1256

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.1-70B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper