Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.5 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Muse Glimmer share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.