Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs o1-mini
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 8.8.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 34.0 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1283 |
| LMArena French | — | 1293 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1303 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than o1-mini?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or o1-mini better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and o1-mini share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.