Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Granite 4.2 30b

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 47.3 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
ProviderMetaIBM
Noometry Index33.741.8
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1396
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts10521374

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert—1406

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English9921340
LMArena Chinese—1414
LMArena Russian—1343

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following10241347

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query—1359

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text10571361
LMArena Creative Writing—1288
LMArena Multi-Turn—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 4.2 30b share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper