Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3.1 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 41.2 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 31.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 102K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.56 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1309 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1278 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.48 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1262 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1257 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |
Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1253 |
| LMArena French | — | 1273 |
| LMArena German | — | 1266 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1283 |
Instruction Following Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1264 |
| IFEval | — | 75% |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1299 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1277 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1253 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 761 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1270 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Mistral Small 3.1?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 38.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Mistral Small 3.1 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.