Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
TencentSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 33.4.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 43.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1418 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1416 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1382 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1397 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.