Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Seed 2.0 Pro
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 54.5 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | ByteDance Seed |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 43.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-14 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1472 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1453 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 57.1% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1439 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1440 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1274 |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1489 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1442 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1460 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1414 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1428 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1441 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Seed 2.0 Pro?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Seed 2.0 Pro share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.