Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs o1-mini

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 8.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o1-mini specifications
Hunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index43.134.0
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
LMArena Coding14181362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14161333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
LMArena Math—1358
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
LMArena Expert—1316

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), o1-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
LMArena Non-English13821289
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Russian—1283
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following13971304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14041320

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o1-mini
LMArena Text14051317
LMArena Creative Writing13881244
LMArena Multi-Turn14221314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than o1-mini?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or o1-mini better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o1-mini share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper