Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs o1-mini

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 8.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o1-mini specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index41.334.0
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1639

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Coding13611362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts13741333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Math13591358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Expert13391316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Non-English13631289
LMArena Chinese14171314
LMArena French13911293
LMArena German13551278
LMArena Japanese13421245
LMArena Korean13511223
LMArena Russian13681283
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following13441304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Longer Query13661320

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o1-mini
LMArena Text13771317
LMArena Creative Writing13591244
LMArena Multi-Turn13871314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than o1-mini?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or o1-mini better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o1-mini share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper