Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5-Flash in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 50.5 to 24.8.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.5-Flash specifications
Codellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.742.5
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena WebDev—1244
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1412
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
ALE-Bench—221.8
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10521403
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LMCA—29.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.98

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
LMArena Math—1407
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
LMArena Expert—1407

Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English9921385
LMArena Chinese—1446
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1368
LMArena Korean—1344
LMArena Russian—1379
LMArena Spanish—1400

Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10241374

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1392

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text10571397
LMArena Creative Writing—1343
LMArena Multi-Turn—1393

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper