Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 43.4 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1268 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1255 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 37.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.