Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 43.4 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3n E4b IT specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
ProviderMetaGoogle
Noometry Index33.737.3
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1268
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts10521284
Kagi LLM Benchmark—31.5%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Math—1251

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Expert—1246

Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Non-English9921285
LMArena Chinese—1309
LMArena French—1330
LMArena German—1311
LMArena Japanese—1272
LMArena Korean—1259
LMArena Russian—1288
LMArena Spanish—1305

Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Instruction Following10241255

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Longer Query—1276

Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Text10571306
LMArena Creative Writing—1287
LMArena Multi-Turn—1276

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 37.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper