Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where MiniMax-M2 leads 45.3 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Codellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index33.737.4
Released—2025-10-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1370
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Too close to call

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts10521357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math—1352

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert—1337

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English9921313
LMArena Chinese—1366
LMArena French—1335
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Russian—1331
LMArena Spanish—1326

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following10241328

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query—1331

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text10571340
LMArena Creative Writing—1286
LMArena Multi-Turn—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiniMax-M2 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper