Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs o1-mini
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 3 categories and o1-mini in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 19.9 to 8.8.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 34.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1362 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1333 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1358 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1316 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1293 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1303 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
Long Context o1-mini leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1320 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than o1-mini?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or o1-mini better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and o1-mini share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.