Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 42.6 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.