Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 58.8 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Codellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index30.842.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding10461436
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10321411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math10561408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert—1421

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English10111385
LMArena Chinese9761447
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Russian—1385
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10281385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query10131402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text10661403
LMArena Creative Writing10321357
LMArena Multi-Turn10151405

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper