Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.2

Rank #285 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.5 to 28.4.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index30.238.6
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.0 (#310), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding10461316
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 18.8 (#250), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts10321299

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#227), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math10561305

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert—1279

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.9 (#279), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English10111290
LMArena Chinese9761331
LMArena Russian—1324

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.4 (#286), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following10281287

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.8 (#279), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query10141307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.4 (#292), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text10661321
LMArena Creative Writing10321328
LMArena Multi-Turn10151292

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 28.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper