Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 28.2.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.