Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1

Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads 50.8 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index30.840.1
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Coding10461296
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Hard Prompts10321311

Math Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Math1056—

Multilingual Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Non-English10111253
LMArena Chinese9761277
LMArena Russian—1269

Instruction Following Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Instruction Following10281293

Long Context Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Longer Query10131299

Writing & Preference Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructLlama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
LMArena Text10661308
LMArena Creative Writing10321288
LMArena Multi-Turn10151315

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better for coding?

Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper