Model comparison
MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen1.5-72B
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.0 to 11.5.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2025-10-27 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1165 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109), Qwen1.5-72B: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads
MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | 1148 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
Math MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1164 |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1335 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1084 |
| LMArena Russian | 1331 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | 1110 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | 1141 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1331 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1361 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.