Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

40.8

Rank #136 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 49.3 to 22.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 68.9% for Claude Opus 4.1 and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $75 for Claude Opus 4.1.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.845.0
Released2025-08-052026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K1M
Max output32K131K
Input $ / M tokens$15$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$75$1.60
Results tracked4832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.3 (#69), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding14791473
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
FrontierCode—10.2%
LMArena WebDev1390—
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML45.9%—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 34.8 (#38), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
Terminal-Bench38%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 31.6 (#70), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
Chess Puzzles7%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14431460
Mystery Game Puzzles21%17%
DTBench80%84%
LMCA37.1%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.11147.39
SimpleBench60%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
ForecastBench62—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.0 (#267), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%93.3%
LMArena Math14301467
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 41.9 (#93), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond77.3%87.9%
LMArena Expert14391467
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.2 (#114), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1281
VPCT35%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.1 (#90), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14051445
LMArena Chinese14271510
LMArena French14321471
LMArena German14121471
LMArena Japanese13781411
LMArena Korean13811416
LMArena Russian14211457
LMArena Spanish14481453

Instruction Following Too close to call

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.8 (#53), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14361439

Long Context Too close to call

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#60), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14551454

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.6 (#70), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14191454
LMArena Creative Writing14121439
LMArena Multi-Turn14441459
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.1 lists at $15 and $75.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper