Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 39.5.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1440 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.