Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 42.0 to 15.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 68.9% for Claude Opus 4.1 and 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index41.027.3
Released2025-08-052023-12-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked4824

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Coding14791108
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
LMArena WebDev1390—
WeirdML45.9%—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—
HumanEval+—55.5%
MBPP+—61.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
Terminal-Bench38%—
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14431109
DTBench80%45.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.12117.04
SimpleBench60%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
LMCA37.1%—
ForecastBench62—

Math Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%1.1%
LMArena Math14311132
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
MATH Level 5—11.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
GPQA Diamond77.3%34%
LMArena Expert14391059
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—
MMLU—70%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
VPCT35%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English14051138
LMArena Chinese14271124
LMArena French14311145
LMArena German14131125
LMArena Japanese13781023
LMArena Russian14221186
LMArena Spanish14481119
LMArena Korean1380—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14351114

Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Longer Query14551132

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 1.0 Pro
LMArena Text14191149
LMArena Creative Writing14121131
LMArena Multi-Turn14441139
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper