Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Gemma 2 9B

Gemma 2 9B has enough public results to be ranked (#341); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 2 9B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Instant leads 19.6 to 15.9.
  • Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Gemma 2 9B specifications
Claude InstantGemma 2 9B
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index29.525.9
Released2023-08-092024-06-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked735

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
BigCodeBench Instruct—34.7%
LiveBench Coding—22.5%
LMArena Coding—1173
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
HumanEval+50.6%—

Reasoning Claude Instant leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28119.83
LiveBench Reasoning—15.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1171
DTBench45.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—36.4%
LiveBench—28.7%
PIQA—83.7%

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
GSM8K86.7%84.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.6%
LiveBench Math—19.8%
LMArena Math—1183
MATH Level 5—21%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
MMLU73.4%72.1%
GPQA Diamond—27.5%
LMArena Expert—1147
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
BoolQ—85.7%
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
LMArena Non-English—1188
LMArena Chinese—1185
LMArena French—1190
LMArena German—1186
LMArena Japanese—1144
LMArena Korean—1137
LMArena Russian—1200
LMArena Spanish—1200

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
LiveBench Instruction Following—52.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1178

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
LMArena Longer Query—1197

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGemma 2 9B
LMArena Text—1207
LMArena Creative Writing—1206
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—841
LMArena Multi-Turn—1193
LiveBench Language—25.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Gemma 2 9B?

Gemma 2 9B has enough public results to be ranked (#341); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Gemma 2 9B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 9B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper