Model comparison
Claude Instant vs Dolly 2.0-12b
Dolly 2.0-12b has enough public results to be ranked (#342); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 1 category and Dolly 2.0-12b in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Instant leads 19.6 to 15.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 25.5 |
| Released | 2023-08-09 | 2023-04-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 776 |
| HumanEval+ | 50.6% | — |
Reasoning Claude Instant leads
Claude Instant: 19.6, Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.28 | 89.67 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 804 |
| DTBench | 45.8% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 70.8% |
| PIQA | — | 75.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 61.8% |
Math Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 871 |
| GSM8K | 86.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 86.3% | 39.6% |
| MMLU | 73.4% | 26.2% |
| BoolQ | — | 56.3% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 39.2% |
| TriviaQA | 78.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 836 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 836 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 814 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Instant: —, Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
| Benchmark | Claude Instant | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 851 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 864 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 740 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Instant better than Dolly 2.0-12b?
Dolly 2.0-12b has enough public results to be ranked (#342); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Dolly 2.0-12b share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.