Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Yi-34B

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 21.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.6% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Yi-34B specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
ProviderAnthropic01.AI
Noometry Index49.527.8
Released2026-10-072023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
LMArena WebDev1587—
LMArena Coding—1112

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1104
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.39

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LMArena Math—1114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
GPQA Diamond89.6%14.7%
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1061
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English—1079
LMArena Chinese—1176
LMArena French—1081
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959
LMArena Russian—1050
LMArena Spanish—1070

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following—1091

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query—1094

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Yi-34B
LMArena Text—1129
LMArena Creative Writing—1108
LMArena Multi-Turn—1113

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Yi-34B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Yi-34B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper