Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 26.6.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index49.527.9
Released2026-10-072024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked935

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena WebDev1587—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
LMArena Coding—1093
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1072
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LiveBench Math—15.7%
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1021
LMArena Chinese—1021
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Russian—1022
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1053

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1044

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1073
LMArena Creative Writing—1037
LMArena Multi-Turn—1018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper