Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Yi-34B

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 53.1 to 7.5.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.1 and Yi-34B specifications
Muse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index49.927.8
Released2026-04-082023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3723

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Coding14981112
DeepSWE53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1542—
SciCode58.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
APEX-Agents31.8%—
τ²-bench Banking40.5%—
GBAEval7.9%—
GDP.pdf15%—
Vending-Bench 26,520—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14861104
Epoch Capabilities Index154.21117.39
NYT Connections (extended)84.9%—
CritPt15.1%—
DTBench94.4%—
LMCA49.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Math14831114
ProofBench39%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Expert14781061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
SimpleQA Verified57.8%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Vision1293—
LMArena Document1465—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English14721079
LMArena Chinese15181176
LMArena French14941081
LMArena German14661042
LMArena Japanese1451993
LMArena Korean1458959
LMArena Russian14831050
LMArena Spanish14641070

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14571091

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14621094

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Yi-34B
LMArena Text14791129
LMArena Creative Writing14371108
LMArena Multi-Turn14851113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1927—
EQ-Bench 41260—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Yi-34B?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.1 and Yi-34B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.1 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper