Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Command R

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 28.0.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5Command R
ProviderAnthropicCohere
Noometry Index49.531.4
Released2026-10-072024-08-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$0.60
Results tracked929

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Command R: 29.3 (#306)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
LMArena WebDev1587—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.1%
LiveBench Coding—17.9%
LMArena Coding—1169
BigCodeBench Complete—45.2%

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Command R: 13.8 (#331)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—21.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1164
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench—46.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—33.3%
LMCA—9.2%
LiveBench—27.5%

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Command R: 28.0 (#246)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
LiveBench Math—19.4%
LMArena Math—1155

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Command R: 31.0 (#221)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
GPQA Diamond89.6%—
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
LMArena Expert—1138
MMLU—65.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Command R: —

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Command R: 35.7 (#245)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
LMArena Non-English—1174
LMArena Chinese—1182
LMArena French—1162
LMArena German—1176
LMArena Japanese—1143
LMArena Korean—1163
LMArena Russian—1174
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Command R: 58.1 (#261)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
LiveBench Instruction Following—55.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1167

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Command R: 36.3 (#231)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
LMArena Longer Query—1198

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Command R: 38.2 (#254)

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Command R
LMArena Text—1187
LMArena Creative Writing—1170
LMArena Multi-Turn—1163
LiveBench Language—16.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Command R?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Command R?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Command R better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Command R share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper